I
never knew that there was a such a huge increase in how much we used
pesticides. In 1945 there were 200 million pounds of pesticides that were used.
In 2000 there were 5.1 billion pounds of pesticides that had been used. This
increase resulted in 500 different types of bugs being resisted to pesticides. These
numbers were necessary because they showed how pesticides were impacting
nature.
When
I had done my own research at home I had a vague since of how accurate the
information was. I was not sure that the source was credible. In this documentary
you get to hear the phone calls, not all of them but bits of pieces. He’s
phoning the companies directly. He talks to farmers, scientist, and people from
the GMO industry making the sources seem much more credible then the ones that
we see online.
This
would be a movie that I would suggest to anybody that is looking to find out
some interesting facts about GMOS. Although it is low budget it still gives you
valuable information that could help you deciding on the decision to live a GMO
free life or one with them.
Photo provided by Google. |
The conversations are part of the film that I remembered as well. It does sound shady the way these phone calls are put into the movie, but they are edited. I have no doubt that these companies are trying to protect their public image by shunning the narrator, but without a real context of these conversations I take them with a grain of salt. Likewise with the statistic of the amount of pesticides used, I maintain skepticism.
ReplyDeleteIt is very disgusting for me to think about the amount of pesticide we use as a country, because we are ultimately eating that. I do not want to think about the amount of chemicals put on the crops that will eventually be feed to animals to butcher for human consumption.
ReplyDeleteYou make a very good point about the overuse of pesticides and their overuse. I however, disagree with you about the use of music and images used in the film. They seem to reinforce the bias of the narrator uses, and I thought that the imagery was trying to make the audience afraid of GMO's.
ReplyDelete